Okay, I have been thinking - now, thinking with a paniced and possibly irrational frame of mind - but I have been thinking about is there any food that is truly "safe". Safe = will not give me any chance of food poisoning or getting ill. I don't think there is because the if the incumbation period for food poisoning can really be as long as 72 hours, then anything we eat could make us sick.
How will I know until it is too late if food has made me sick? I sometimes see eating as too great of risk to take to avoid V*. Why even eat if there is a chance I am going to sick? Getting sick defeats the purpose of eating. It is like I'm playing a game of chance with food because I don't believe there is such a thing as a true "safe food" because I won't ever know until 72 hours later.
The scary thing is I see this scientific experiement going on in my head as I eat one thing, wait 72 hours, and then eat something else and wait another 72 hours, etc... just trying to figure out what might make me sick --- yet I know that getting sick has more variables in it than just food. So if I remove one variable at a time from the equation, I increase my odds at staying healthy. The variable I choose to remove is the food from the equation, yet without food I will die. The variable I remove causes my experiment to eventually stop because its participant dies, making the experiment unethical and not legal to do. ***I love research and doing experiments in psychology (that was my undergraduate major). Sorry for the psychobabble... but it makes some twisted sense to me in my head.***
Am I just totally losing it and letting my anxiety get to me or does anyone else see where I am coming from?Edited by: purpleteacher
I\'m always a shade of purple...
FACEBOOK ME --
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.