Welcome to the International Emetophobia Society | The Web's Largest Meeting Place for People With Emetophobia.
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    5,096

    Default

    To learn more about emetophobia, see
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,866

    Default



    Wow- the legal loopholes these lawyers will come up with....


    Just another way for people to wiggle out of being responsible for their own actions.


    *amber*

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,163

    Default

    haha i found that funny.
    ♥Stephanie

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Thanks to sarah140 for my avatar and Fiona for my siggie
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



    \"We can\'t help everyone. But everyone can help someone\"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,179

    Default

    GOOD! Now if that only worked to protect people who were bulimic...
    I\'m always a shade of purple...
    FACEBOOK ME --
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    883

    Default

    Sounds like a good ruling to me. I mean, what the hell?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,866

    Default



    Well, it seems like a "duh" ruling in terms of, of COURSE things we do in the bathroomare private. BUT, if you are breaking the law and this was used as an excuse to get out of a conviction that you deserve, then to me it just seems like today's youth is further finding loopholes to get out of being accountable for their own actions, legal and illegal.


    I don't agree with even having a legal drinking age- but this, to me, seems like a pretty lame attempt by someone to wiggle out of being caught red-handed (or vomit-mouthed as the case may be).


    *amber*

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Well, in the legal system, you have to look at your right to appeal and
    on which grounds you should appeal. This is actually a very important
    case that establishes a huge precedent: hearing someone vomiting is not
    probable cause for a search. Now, I doubt this girl's intention was to
    fight for the right of privacy, but remember that this will extend to
    future cases where any such intrusion is an invasion of privacy. Of
    course, I'm a Libertarian regarding most things, so I'm a little
    protective of privacy rights.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    5,096

    Default



    Amber and all,


    You might want to read the actual court opinion. There was a dissenting justice who agreed with Amber.


    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...pl?court=mt&am p;vol=03&invol=392


    Doug
    To learn more about emetophobia, see
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,866

    Default



    Thanks for the link Doug- I definitely agree with the dissenting judge.


    People have died from extreme consumption of alcohol- whether it be from having too much of it in their system, choking, etc- especially ifthey are young and do not yet know their limits.Hell, I know that after being a guide for my department's frosh week a few times that if we had someone who was extremely intoxicated, we would bring them to the hospital just to be safe. Who knows what could have been going on- the girl could have been on her back for all the cop knew.


    Not to mention this little factoid:


    <<Officer Guiberson was justified in opening the door to the bathroom and checking on Ms. Smith. If he had not done so, and had she suffered any injury from alcohol consumption, he probably would have been sued.>>


    Apparently you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't!


    And it's not like she was at home, and the cops came and just entered her bathroom unwarranted. She was at a loud houseparty where minors were drinking.


    *amber*



    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •